Published
2021-08-14
Issue
Section
Original Research Article
License
The Author(s) warrant that permission to publish the article has not been previously assigned elsewhere.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher right for the first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under:
OA - Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license allows for the copying, distribution and transmission of the work, provided the correct attribution of the original creator is stated. Adaptation and remixing are also permitted.
This license intends to facilitate free access to, as well as the unrestricted reuse of, original works of all types for non-commercial purposes.
How to Cite
Analysis of chemical components and liquefaction process of eucalyptus globulus bark
Yongjun Liu
Liangshan Prefecture Bureau of Forestry and Grassland
Hongzhou Shi
Liangshan Prefecture Institute of Forestry Science
Yangmei Wang
Liangshan Institute of Agricultural Sciences
Jing Wen
Liangshan Prefecture Institute of Forestry Science
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/ace.v4i2.1347
Keywords: Eucalyptus, Bark, Chemical Composition, Liquefaction
Abstract
For 5-year-old Eucalyptus globulus, the optimal liquefaction bark process was explored by analyzing the chemical components of the bark and its liquefaction residue before and after the liquefaction. The results of chemical component determination showed that the contents of cellulose,hemicellulose and lignin of bark were 36.65%, 18.98%, and 45.37% respectively. The contents of benzene-alcohol extractives,hot-water extractives and 1% NaOH extractives were 10.30%, 7.15%, and 23.64% respectively. The content of ash accounted for 7.49%. The liquefaction process showed that the catalytic effect of concentrated sulfuric acid was better than concentrated phosphoric acid. The optimum liquefaction parameters were catalytic of 3% concentrated sulfuric acid,temperature of 160 ℃ and the liquid-solid ratio of 5:1. The liquefaction rate was 82.8% under the above optimal conditions. Compared with raw materials, the cellulose content, hemicellulose content, and lignin content of liquefaction residue reduced by 17.90%, 9.19%, and 15.99%, respectively.References
[1] Xiong J. Myrtle family. In: Flora of Sichuan (v8). Chengdu: Sichuan People’s Publishing House; 1990. p. 305.[2] Yang X, Feng L, Hua W. Way out and prospect of development and use of energy sources in China (in Chinese). Frontier Science 2012; (2): 22-29.
[3] Fu S, Ma L, Li, W. Studies on liquefaction of bamboo and properties of liquefied-bamboo adhesives (in Chinese). Chemistry and Industry of Forest Products 2004; 24(3): 42-46.
[4] Kobayashi M, Tukamoto K, Tomita B. Application of liquefied wood to a new resin system-synthesis and properties of liquefied wood epoxy resins. Holzforschung 2000; 54(1): 93-97.
[5] Fu S, Yu R, Du B, et al. Liquefaction of bamboo and preparation of liquefied bamboo adhesive (in Chinese). China Forest Products Industry 2004; 31(3): 35-38.
[6] Zhang Y, Chi Q, Sun Y, et al. Research of liquefaction of wood and its utilization for polyurethane adhesives (in Chinese). Chemistry and Industry of Forest Products 2007; 27(5): 73-77.
[7] Lin L, Yao Y, Yoshioka M, et al. Preparation and properties of phenolated wood phenol formaldehyde cocondensed resin. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 1995; 58(8): 1297-1304.
[8] Alma M, Yao Y, Yoshioka M, et al. The preparation and flow properties of HCl catalyzed phenolated wood and its blends with commercial novolak resin. Holzforschung 1996; 50(1): 85-90.
[9] Lee SH, Yoshioka M, Shiraishi N. Resol-type phenolic resin from liquefied phenolated wood and its application to phenolic foam (in Chinese). Journal of Applied Polymer Science 2002; 84(3): 468-472.
[10] Wang C, Cui L, Zhang J. Development status and research prospect of wood liquefaction (in Chinese). Forestry Science & Technology 2007; 32(3): 42-43.
[11] Jie S, Zhang Q, Zhao G. Process of wood liquefaction and its application in preparation of polymer materials (in Chinese). Biomass Chemical Engineering 2005; (6): 43-49.