Applied Chemical Engineering

Unlocking the potential of polymer 3D printed electronics: Challenges and solutions

S Raja

Center of Additive Manufacturing, Chennai Institute of Technology

Mohammed Ahmed Mustafa

Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Imam Jaafar AL-Sadiq University

Ghadir Kamil Ghadir

College of Pharmacy, Al-Farahidi University

Hayder Musaad Al-Tmimi

Department of Pathological Analysis, College of Health Medical Techniques, Al-Bayan University

Zaid Khalid Alani

Department of Pathological Analysis, College of Health Medical Techniques, Al-Bayan University

Maher Ali Rusho

Lockheed Martin Performance-Based Master of Engineering in Engineering Management (ME-EM) Degree Program, University of Colorado Boulder

N. Rajeswari

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Surya Engineering College

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/ace.v7i2.3877

Keywords: integration, functionalities, printing process, layer-by-layer, multimaterial printing

---

Abstract

The field of 3D printed electronics has been rapidly growing in recent years, with the potential to revolutionize industries such as healthcare, aerospace, and consumer electronics. Polymer 3D printing has emerged as a promising technique for fabricating electronic devices due to its versatility, scalability, and cost-effectiveness. However, there are several challenges that need to be addressed in order to fully unlock the potential of polymer 3D printed electronics. This research paper discusses the current state of the art in this field, highlighting the current challenges and proposing potential solutions. These challenges include material selection, design considerations, printing techniques, and post-processing methods. In addition, the paper explores the limitations of existing polymer materials and presents recent advances in the development of new functional materials for 3D printing. Furthermore, the integration of various components and multi-material printing techniques are also discussed as key factors in advancing the capabilities of 3D printed electronics. Finally, this paper provides insights and recommendations for future research directions in order to fully realize the potential of polymer 3D printed electronics.

---

References

[1]. Bakhtiari, H., Aamir, M., & Tolouei-Rad, M. (2023). Effect of 3D Printing Parameters on the Fatigue Properties of Parts Manufactured by Fused Filament Fabrication: A Review. Applied Sciences, 13(2), 904.

[2]. Sawant, D. A., Shinde, B. M., & Raykar, S. J. (2023). Post processing techniques used to improve the quality of 3D printed parts using FDM: State of art review and experimental work. Materials Today: Proceedings.

[3]. Praveenkumar V, Raja S, Jamadon NH, Yishak S. Role of laser power and scan speed combination on the surface quality of additive manufactured nickel-based superalloy. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications. 2023; 0(0). doi:10.1177/14644207231212566

[4]. Griffin, K., & Pappas, D. (2023). 3D printed microfluidics for bioanalysis: A review of recent advancements and applications. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 158, 116892.

[5]. Hamat, S., Ishak, M. R., Sapuan, S. M., Yidris, N., Hussin, M. S., & Abd Manan, M. S. (2023). Influence of filament fabrication parameter on tensile strength and filament size of 3D printing PLA-3D850. Materials Today: Proceedings, 74, 457-461.

[6]. S. Raja, A. John Rajan, "Challenges and Opportunities in Additive Manufacturing Polymer Technology: A Review Based on Optimization Perspective", Advances in Polymer Technology, vol. 2023, Article ID 8639185, 18 pages, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8639185

[7]. S., R., & A., J. R. (2023). SELECTION OF POLYMER EXTRUSION PARAMETERS BY FACTORIAL EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN – A DECISION MAKING MODEL. Scientia Iranica, (), -. doi: 10.24200/sci.2023.60096.6591

[8]. Mohammed Ahmed Mustafa, S. Raja, Layth Abdulrasool A. L. Asadi, Nashrah Hani Jamadon, N. Rajeswari, Avvaru Praveen Kumar, "A Decision-Making Carbon Reinforced Material Selection Model for Composite Polymers in Pipeline Applications", Advances in Polymer Technology, vol. 2023, Article ID 6344193, 9 pages, 2023.

[9]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6344193

[10]. Volpe, S., Sangiorgio, V., Fiorito, F., & Varum, H. (2024). Overview of 3D construction printing and future perspectives: A review of technology, companies and research progression. Architectural Science Review, 67(1), 1-22.

[11]. Raja, S., Agrawal, A. P., Patil, P. P., Thimothy, P., Capangpangan, R. Y., Singhal, P., & Wotango, M. T. (2022). Optimization of 3D Printing Process Parameters of Polylactic Acid Filament Based on the Mechanical Test. 2022.

[12]. Subramani, R., Kaliappan, S., Arul, P. V, Sekar, S., Poures, M. V. De, Patil, P. P., & Esakki, E. S. (2022). A Recent Trend on Additive Manufacturing Sustainability with Supply Chain Management Concept , Multicriteria Decision Making Techniques. 2022.

[13]. Raja, S., Logeshwaran, J., Venkatasubramanian, S., Jayalakshmi, M., Rajeswari, N., Olaiya, N. G., & Mammo, W. D. (2022). OCHSA: Designing Energy-Efficient Lifetime-Aware Leisure Degree Adaptive Routing Protocol with Optimal Cluster Head Selection for 5G Communication Network Disaster Management. 2022.

[14]. S, Raja and N, Rajeswari (2023) "Optimization of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene Filament 3D Printing Process Parameters based on Mechanical Test," International Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering: Vol. 4: Iss. 3, Article 4. DOI: 10.47893/IJMIE.2023.1204.

[15]. Qu, J., Wu, Q., Clancy, T., & Liu, X. (2016, July). Design and calibration of 3D-printed micro force sensors. In 2016 International Conference on Manipulation, Automation and Robotics at Small Scales (MARSS) (pp. 1-4). IEEE..

[16]. Sekhar, K. C., Surakasi, R., Roy, P., Rosy, P. J., Sreeja, T. K., Raja, S., & Chowdary, V. L. (2022). Mechanical Behavior of Aluminum and Graphene Nanopowder-Based Composites. 2022.

[17]. Yusoff, N. H. M., Chong, C. H., Wan, Y. K., Cheah, K. H., & Wong, V. L. (2023). Optimization strategies and emerging application of functionalized 3D-printed materials in water treatment: A review. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 51, 103410.

[18]. Venkatasubramanian, S., Raja, S., Sumanth, V., Dwivedi, J. N., Sathiaparkavi, J., Modak, S., & Kejela, M. L. (2022). Fault Diagnosis Using Data Fusion with Ensemble Deep Learning Technique in IIoT. 2022.

[19]. Raja, S., Rajan, A. J., Kumar, V. P., Rajeswari, N., Girija, M., Modak, S., Kumar, R. V., & Mammo, W. D. (2022). Selection of Additive Manufacturing Machine Using Analytical Hierarchy Process. 2022.

[20]. Qu, J., Wu, Q., Clancy, T., Fan, Q., Wang, X., & Liu, X. (2020). 3D-printed strain-gauge micro force sensors. IEEE Sensors Journal, 20(13), 6971-6978.

[21]. Gad, M. M., & Fouda, S. M. (2023). Factors affecting flexural strength of 3D‐printed resins: A systematic review. Journal of Prosthodontics, 32(S1), 96-110.

[22]. Raja, S., & Rajan, A. J. (2022). A Decision-Making Model for Selection of the Suitable FDM Machine Using Fuzzy TOPSIS. 2022.

[23]. Olaiya, N. G., Maraveas, C., Salem, M. A., Raja, S., Rashedi, A., Alzahrani, A. Y., El-Bahy, Z. M., & Olaiya, F. G. (2022). Viscoelastic and Properties of Amphiphilic Chitin in Plasticised Polylactic Acid/Starch Biocomposite. Polymers, 14(11), 2268. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14112268

[24]. Díaz-Rodríguez, J. G., Pertuz-Comas, A. D., & Bohórquez-Becerra, O. R. (2023). Impact Strength for 3D-Printed PA6 Polymer Composites under Temperature Changes. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing, 7(5), 178.

[25]. Subramani, R., Kaliappan, S., Sekar, S., Patil, P. P., Usha, R., Manasa, N., & Esakkiraj, E. S. (2022). Polymer Filament Process Parameter Optimization with Mechanical Test and Morphology Analysis. 2022.

[26]. Raja Subramani, Arun Kumar Kalidass, Mohan Dass Muneeswaran, Balaji Gantala Lakshmipathi. (2024). Effect of fused deposition modeling process parameter in influence of mechanical property of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene polymer. Applied Chemical Engineering, 7(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/ace.v7i1.3576