Applied Chemical Engineering

An analysis of polymer material selection and design optimization to improve Structural Integrity in 3D printed aerospace components

S Raja

Center of Additive Manufacturing, Chennai Institute of Technology

Hayder Musaad Al-Tmimi

Department of Pathological Analysis, College of Health Medical Techniques, Al-Bayan University

Ghadir Kamil Ghadir

College of Pharmacy, Al-Farahidi University

Mohammed Ahmed Mustafa

Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, University of Imam Jaafar AL-Sadiq

Zaid Khalid Alani

Department of Pathological Analysis, College of Health Medical Techniques, Al-Bayan University

Maher Ali Rusho

Lockheed Martin Performance-Based Master of Engineering in Engineering Management (ME-EM) Degree Program, University of Colorado Boulder

N. Rajeswari

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Surya Engineering College

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/ace.v7i2.1875

Keywords: material selection; design optimization; structural integrity; 3D Printing; aerospace

---

Abstract

This paper presents an analysis of material selection and design optimization techniques to enhance the structural integrity of 3D printed aerospace components. The study highlights the importance of considering material characteristics and design factors such as shape, orientation, and support structures in order to achieve reliable and high-performance components. Various materials, including metals and polymers, commonly used in aerospace applications are evaluated, along with their properties and limitations in the context of 3D printing. Furthermore, the impact of different printing parameters on the structural integrity of the components is discussed. The study identifies optimization strategies such as topology optimization, lattice structures, and infill patterns, which can significantly improve the strength and durability of 3D printed parts. The results demonstrate the potential of these techniques to optimize the design and material selection of aerospace components, leading to lighter, more efficient, and reliable parts for air and space vehicles.

---

References

[1]. S R, N R. Optimization of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene Filament 3D Printing Process Parameters based on Mechanical Test. International Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering. Published online April 2023: 35-47. doi: 10.47893/ijmie.2023.1204

[2]. Dhakal N, Wang X, Espejo C, et al. Impact of processing defects on microstructure, surface quality, and tribological performance in 3D printed polymers. Journal of Materials Research and Technology. 2023, 23: 1252-1272. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.01.086

[3]. Sekhar KC, Surakasi R, Roy DrP, et al. Mechanical Behavior of Aluminum and Graphene Nanopowder-Based Composites. Balaji GL, ed. International Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2022, 2022: 1-13. doi: 10.1155/2022/2224482

[4]. Mohd Yusoff NH, Chong CH, Wan YK, et al. Optimization strategies and emerging application of functionalized 3D-printed materials in water treatment: A review. Journal of Water Process Engineering. 2023, 51: 103410. doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.103410

[5]. Venkatasubramanian S, Raja S, Sumanth V, et al. Fault Diagnosis Using Data Fusion with Ensemble Deep Learning Technique in IIoT. Gupta P, ed. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2022, 2022: 1-8. doi: 10.1155/2022/1682874

[6]. Raja S, John Rajan A, Praveen Kumar V, et al. Selection of Additive Manufacturing Machine Using Analytical Hierarchy Process. Gupta P, ed. Scientific Programming. 2022, 2022: 1-20. doi: 10.1155/2022/1596590

[7]. Aguirre-Cortés JM, Moral-Rodríguez AI, Bailón-García E, et al. 3D printing in photocatalysis: Methods and capabilities for the improved performance. Applied Materials Today. 2023, 32: 101831. doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2023.101831

[8]. Gad MM, Fouda SM. Factors affecting flexural strength of 3D‐printed resins: A systematic review. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2023, 32(S1): 96-110. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13640

[9]. Raja S, Rajan AJ. A Decision-Making Model for Selection of the Suitable FDM Machine Using Fuzzy TOPSIS. Gupta P, ed. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2022, 2022: 1-15. doi: 10.1155/2022/7653292

[10]. Olaiya NG, Maraveas C, Salem MA, et al. Viscoelastic and Properties of Amphiphilic Chitin in Plasticised Polylactic Acid/Starch Biocomposite. Polymers. 2022, 14(11): 2268. doi: 10.3390/polym14112268

[11]. Díaz-Rodríguez JG, Pertuz-Comas AD, Bohórquez-Becerra OR. Impact Strength for 3D-Printed PA6 Polymer Composites under Temperature Changes. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing. 2023, 7(5): 178. doi: 10.3390/jmmp7050178

[12]. Subramani R, Kaliappan S, Sekar S, et al. Polymer Filament Process Parameter Optimization with Mechanical Test and Morphology Analysis. Thanigaivelan R, ed. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering. 2022, 2022: 1-8. doi: 10.1155/2022/8259804

[13]. Bakhtiari H, Aamir M, Tolouei-Rad M. Effect of 3D Printing Parameters on the Fatigue Properties of Parts Manufactured by Fused Filament Fabrication: A Review. Applied Sciences. 2023, 13(2): 904. doi: 10.3390/app13020904

[14]. Sawant DA, Shinde BM, Raykar SJ. Post processing techniques used to improve the quality of 3D printed parts using FDM: State of art review and experimental work. Materials Today: Proceedings. Published online September 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.09.202

[15]. Praveenkumar V, Raja S, Jamadon NH, et al. Role of laser power and scan speed combination on the surface quality of additive manufactured nickel-based superalloy. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications. Published online November 13, 2023. doi: 10.1177/14644207231212566

[16]. Griffin K, Pappas D. 3D printed microfluidics for bioanalysis: A review of recent advancements and applications. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 2023, 158: 116892. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2022.116892

[17]. Hamat S, Ishak MR, Sapuan SM, et al. Influence of filament fabrication parameter on tensile strength and filament size of 3D printing PLA-3D850. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2023, 74: 457-461. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.11.145

[18]. Raja S, John Rajan A. Challenges and Opportunities in Additive Manufacturing Polymer Technology: A Review Based on Optimization Perspective. Suyambulingam I, ed. Advances in Polymer Technology. 2023, 2023: 1-18. doi: 10.1155/2023/8639185

[19]. S R, A JR. Selection of polymer extrusion parameters by factorial experimental design—A decision making model. Scientia Iranica. 2023. doi: 10.24200/sci.2023.60096.6591

[20]. Mustafa MA, Raja S, Asadi LAAL, et al. A Decision-Making Carbon Reinforced Material Selection Model for Composite Polymers in Pipeline Applications. Suyambulingam I, ed. Advances in Polymer Technology. 2023, 2023: 1-9. doi: 10.1155/2023/6344193

[21]. Volpe S, Sangiorgio V, Fiorito F, et al. Overview of 3D construction printing and future perspectives: a review of technology, companies and research progression. Architectural Science Review. 2022, 67(1): 1-22. doi: 10.1080/00038628.2022.2154740

[22]. Raja S, Agrawal AP, P Patil P, et al. Optimization of 3D Printing Process Parameters of Polylactic Acid Filament Based on the Mechanical Test. Balaji GL, ed. International Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2022, 2022: 1-7. doi: 10.1155/2022/5830869

[23]. Subramani R, Kaliappan S, Arul kumar PV, et al. A Recent Trend on Additive Manufacturing Sustainability with Supply Chain Management Concept, Multicriteria Decision Making Techniques. Thanigaivelan R, ed. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering. 2022, 2022: 1-12. doi: 10.1155/2022/9151839

[24]. Raja S, Logeshwaran J, Venkatasubramanian S, et al. OCHSA: Designing Energy-Efficient Lifetime-Aware Leisure Degree Adaptive Routing Protocol with Optimal Cluster Head Selection for 5G Communication Network Disaster Management. Gupta P, ed. Scientific Programming. 2022, 2022: 1-11. doi: 10.1155/2022/5424356

[25]. Subramani R, Kalidass AK, Muneeswaran MD, et al. Effect of fused deposition modeling process parameter in influence of mechanical property of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene polymer. Applied Chemical Engineering. 2024, 7(1). doi: 10.24294/ace.v7i1.3576