Published
2024-12-26
Section
Original Research Article
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Israa Nsaif Jasim, Amal Hamza Khalil
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Author(s) warrant that permission to publish the article has not been previously assigned elsewhere.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher right for the first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under:
OA - Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license allows for the copying, distribution and transmission of the work, provided the correct attribution of the original creator is stated. Adaptation and remixing are also permitted.
This license intends to facilitate free access to, as well as the unrestricted reuse of, original works of all types for non-commercial purposes.
How to Cite
Assessment of the effect pre-treated using ultrasonic and hydrothermal technique for wheat and corn stalks on biogas generation and methane yield
Israa Nsaif Jasim
Department of Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Babylon, 80361,Iraq
Amal Hamza Khalil
Department of Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Babylon, 80361,Iraq
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/ace.v7i4.5575
Abstract
Current study aims to estimate the impact of physical pretreatment of wheat stalks and corn stalks on biogas production, where two types of pretreatment were used (ultrasonic pretreatment and hydrothermal pretreatment) and three types of animal manure were used as a source of bacteria (cow, sheep and ostrich manure). The results showed a high increment in the amount of biogas generated after pretreatment, as the increase when using ultrasonic pretreatment for wheat stalks inoculated with cow, sheep, and ostrich manure were 31.92%, 20.63%, 155.24%, respectively as compared with untreated samples of wheat stalks. As for the corn stalks, the increase in the biogas when ultrasonic pretreatment for corn stalks inoculated with cow, sheep, and ostrich manure was 57.12%, 43.38%, and 173.05%, respectively, as compared with untreated samples of corn stalks. In hydrothermal pretreatment, the increase in biogas generated by pretreatment for wheat stalks inoculated with cow and sheep manure was 30.57% and 6.10 %, respectively, compared with an untreated sample of wheat stalks. In the hydrothermal pretreatment for corn stalks, the increase was 29.69% and 3.67 %, respectively as compared with untreated sample of corn stalks with the same manure above. An increase was also observed in the amount of methane generated after each of the pre-treated, as the increase in the ultrasonic pretreatment for wheat stalks inoculated cow, sheep, and ostrich manure were 25.25%, 21.96% and 160.78 %, respectively. Whereas, when ultrasonic pretreatment for corn stalks the increase was 88.06%, 54.13%, and 210.91 %, respectively. In hydrothermal pretreatment, the increase in the amount of methane for wheat stalks inoculated with cow and sheep manure was 13.59% and 13.67 %, while, in the corn stalks inoculated with cow and sheep manure was 42.90% and 27.23 %, respectively. Finally, the highest biogas and methane production was obtained when ostrich dung was used as inoculum with wheat and corn stalks pre-treated using ultrasound compared to cow and sheep manure. A substantial accord was seen between the values that were measured and the values that were expected by the modified Gompertz model, as indicated by correlation coefficients that were ≥ 0.96.
References
[1]. Ibeaja, A. C. E., Nwaogazie, I. L., & Udeh, N. (2023). Influence of Potash on Biogas Production from Cow Dung and Food Waste. J. Eng. Res. Rep, 24(7), 43-52.
[2]. Pax, M. E., Muzenda, E., & Lekgoba, T. (2020). Effect of co-digestion of food waste and cow dung on biogas yield. E3S Web of Conferences, 181, 01005.
[3]. Zheng, Y., Zhao, J., Xu, F., & Li, Y. (2014). Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for enhanced biogas production. Progress in energy and combustion science, 42, 35-53.
[4]. Moset, V., Xavier, C. d. A. N., Feng, L., Wahid, R., & Møller, H. B. (2018). Combined low thermal alkali addition and mechanical pre-treatment to improve biogas yield from wheat straw. Journal of cleaner production, 172 (20), 1391-1398.
[5]. Sambusiti, C., Monlau, F., Ficara, E., Carrère, H., & Malpei, F. (2013). A comparison of different pre-treatments to increase methane production from two agricultural substrates. Applied Energy, 104, 62-70.
[6]. Rajput, A. A., & Hassan, M. (2021). Enhancing biogas production through co-digestion and thermal pretreatment of wheat straw and sunflower meal. Renewable energy, 168, 1-10.
[7]. Olatunji, K. O., Ahmed, N. A., & Ogunkunle, O. (2021). Optimization of biogas yield from lignocellulosic materials with different pretreatment methods: a review. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 14(159), 1-34.
[8]. Sambusiti, C., Ficara, E., Rollini, M., Musatti, A., Retinò, I., Manzoni, M., & Malpei, F. (2013). Impact of different types of pretreatment on methane production of two agricultural substrates. Paper presented at the Proceeding of 13th World Congress on Anaerobic Digestion–Recovering (Bio) resources for the World.
[9]. Noori, N.A., 2017, "Sustainable Approach Biogas Recovery from Co-digestion of Giant Reed for Clean Energy Production", M. Sc. Thesis, University of Baghdad, Iraq.
[10]. Xue, X., Li, X., & Shimizu, N. (2023). Synthesis evaluation on thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of tomato plant residue with cattle manure and food waste. Resources, Environment and Sustainability, 13, 100119.
[11]. Saboor, A., Khan, S., Ali Shah, A., Hasan, F., Khan, H., & Badshah, M. (2017). Enhancement of biomethane production from cattle manure with codigestion of dilute acid pretreated lignocellulosic biomass. International journal of green energy, 14(Issue7), 632-637.
[12]. Jassim, H. (2019). Enhanced Biogas production from Rice Husks and Okra Stalks by Co-Digestion with Ostrich Dung and Cow Manure. M. Sc. Thesis, University of Babylon, Iraq.
[13]. Cesaro, A., Naddeo, V., Amodio, V., & Belgiorno, V. (2012). Enhanced biogas production from anaerobic codigestion of solid waste by sonolysis. Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 19(3), 596-600.
[14]. Ismail, Z. Z., & Talib, A. R. (2016). Recycled medical cotton industry waste as a source of biogas recovery. Journal of cleaner production, 112, 4413-4418.
[15]. Alzate, M., Muñoz, R., Rogalla, F., Fdz-Polanco, F., & Pérez-Elvira, S. (2012). Biochemical methane potential of microalgae: influence of substrate to inoculum ratio, biomass concentration and pretreatment. Bioresource technology, 123, 488-494.
[16]. Hesami, S. M., Zilouei, H., Karimi, K., & Asadinezhad, A. (2015). Enhanced biogas production from sunflower stalks using hydrothermal and organosolv pretreatment. Industrial Crops and Products, 76, 449-455.
[17]. Strömberg, S., Nistor, M., & Liu, J. (2014). Towards eliminating systematic errors caused by the experimental conditions in Biochemical Methane Potential (BMP) tests. Waste management, 34(11), 1939-1948.
[18]. Jassim, H., & Khalil, A. H. (2021). Improving Biogas Production Using Different Pre- treatment of Rice Husk Inoculated with Ostrich Dung. The Journal of Engineering Research, 18(1), 1-11 .
[19]. Aksay, M. V., Ozkaymak, M., & Calhan, R. (2018). Co-digestion of cattle manure and tea waste for biogas production. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research, 8(3), 1347-1353.
[20]. Zhang, R., El-Mashad, H. M., Hartman, K., Wang, F., Liu, G., Choate, C., & Gamble, P. (2007). Characterization of food waste as feedstock for anaerobic digestion. Bioresource technology, 98(4), 929-935.
[21]. Ghatak, M., & Mahanata, P. (2018). Effect of temperature on biogas production from rice straw and rice husk. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 377, 012146.
[22]. Orhorhoro, E. K., Ebunilo, P. O., & Sadjere, G. E. (2017). Experimental determination of effect of total solid (TS) and volatile solid (VS) on biogas yield. American Journal of Modern Energy, 3(6), 131-135.
[23]. Association,1980. Official Analytical Chemists, and Association of official Agricultural Chemists (US). Official methods of analysis(Vol.13).
[24]. Ismail, Z. Z., & Noori, N. A. (2018). Anaerobic co-digestion of giant reed for biogas recovery. Journal of Engineering, 24(3), 68-83.
[25]. Jeung, J. H., Chung, W. J., & Chang, S. W. (2019). Evaluation of anaerobic co-digestion to enhance the efficiency of livestock manure anaerobic digestion. Sustainability, 11(24), 7170.
[26]. Ismail, Z. Z., & Talib, A. R. (2014). Biogas Recovery from Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Poultry House Wastes for Clean Energy Production. Journal of Engineering, 20(05), 95-108.
[27]. Wu, Y., Yao, S., Narale, B. A., Shanmugam, A., Mettu, S., & Ashokkumar, M. (2022). Ultrasonic processing of food waste to generate value-added products. Foods, 11(14), 2035.
[28]. Chandra, R., Takeuchi, H., Hasegawa, T., & Kumar, R. (2012). Improving biodegradability and biogas production of wheat straw substrates using sodium hydroxide and hydrothermal pretreatments. Energy, 43(1), 273-282.
[29]. Pansripong, S., Arjharn, W., Liplap, P., & Hinsui, T. (2019). Effect of ultrasonic pretreatment on biogas production from rice straw. Oriental journal of chemistry, 35(4), 1265-1273.
[30]. Simioni, T., Agustini, C. B., Dettmer, A., & Gutterres, M. (2022). Enhancement of biogas production by anaerobic co-digestion of leather waste with raw and pretreated wheat straw. Energy, 253, 124051.
[31]. Jasim, H. S., & Ismail, Z. Z. (2022). Biogas recovery from refinery oily sludge by co-digestion followed by sustainable approach for recycling the residual digestate in concrete mixes. Advances in Science and Technology. Research Journal, 16(5).