Applied Chemical Engineering

Optimization of FDM process parameters using fuzzy AHP–TOPSIS for PLA-Based green composites

Hayjaa Mohaisen Mousa

Department of Medicinal Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, Al-Turath University, Baghdad,10013, Iraq

Ala’a D. Noor

Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Al Farahidi University, Baghdad, Iraq

Haider Falih Shamikh Al-Saedi

College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Al-Ameed, Karbala Governorate, 56001,Iraq

Shahlaa Majid J.

College of Pharmacy, Al-Hadi University College, Baghdad,10011, Iraq

Jaber Hameed Hussain

Department of Medical Laboratories Technology, Al-Nisour University College, Baghdad,10015, Iraq

Mohannad Mohammed

Department of Pharmaceutics, Warka University College, Basrah,110073, Iraq

Israa Alhani

Department of Pharmaceutics, Mazaya University College, Dhi Qar, 21974,Iraq

Baraa G. Alani

College of pharmacy, Al-bayan university, Baghdad, Iraq

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/ace.v8i4.5727

Keywords: Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM); additive manufacturing; sustainable manufacturing; multi-criteria decision making (MCDM); process parameter optimization; eco-friendly materials; sustainable development goals (SDGs)

---

Abstract

The global shift toward sustainable manufacturing has intensified interest in eco-friendly materials and optimized processing strategies for additive manufacturing technologies such as Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM). Polylactic acid (PLA)-based green composites have emerged as promising candidates due to their biodegradability, low environmental impact, and compatibility with FDM systems. However, the optimization of FDM process parameters for such composites remains a significant challenge due to the inherent trade-offs between mechanical performance, energy consumption, and material sustainability. This study addresses this gap by employing an integrated multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework—Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP) combined with Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)—to identify optimal FDM parameter settings for PLA-based green composites. Key process parameters, including layer thickness, print speed, infill density, and nozzle temperature, are evaluated against performance criteria such as tensile strength, surface finish, material utilization, and energy efficiency. Literature reports suggest optimal ranges such as 0.1–0.2 mm for layer thickness, 40–60 mm/s for print speed, and 80–100% for infill density to enhance part strength and minimize waste. The Fuzzy AHP–TOPSIS approach enables robust decision-making under uncertainty, providing a sustainable design methodology aligned with SDGs 4 (Quality Education), 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy), 9 (Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure), and 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production). This study establishes a foundational framework for future experimental validation and promotes informed parameter selection for sustainable, high-performance FDM manufacturing of PLA-based green composites.

---

References

[1]. Alzyod, H., Kónya, G., & Ficzere, P. (2025). Integrating additive and subtractive manufacturing to optimize surface quality of MEX parts. Results in Engineering, 25, 103713.

[2]. Aarthi, S., Subramani, R., Rusho, M. A., Sharma, S., Ramachandran, T., Mahapatro, A., & Ismail, A. I. (2025). Genetically engineered 3D printed functionally graded-lignin, starch, and cellulose-derived sustainable biopolymers and composites: A critical review. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 145843.

[3]. Lazarus, B., Raja, S., Shanmugam, K., & Yishak, S. (2024). Analysis and Optimization of Thermoplastic Polyurethane Infill Patterns for Additive Manufacturing in Pipeline Applications.

[4]. Mohammed Ahmed Mustafa, S. Raja, Layth Abdulrasool A. L. Asadi, Nashrah Hani Jamadon, N. Rajeswari, Avvaru Praveen Kumar, "A Decision-Making Carbon Reinforced Material Selection Model for Composite Polymers in Pipeline Applications", Advances in Polymer Technology, vol. 2023, Article ID 6344193, 9 pages, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6344193

[5]. Olaiya, N. G., Maraveas, C., Salem, M. A., Raja, S., Rashedi, A., Alzahrani, A. Y., El-Bahy, Z. M., & Olaiya, F. G. (2022). Viscoelastic and Properties of Amphiphilic Chitin in Plasticised Polylactic Acid/Starch Biocomposite. Polymers, 14(11), 2268. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14112268

[6]. Praveenkumar, V., Raja, S., Jamadon, N. H., & Yishak, S. (2023). Role of laser power and scan speed combination on the surface quality of additive manufactured nickel-based superalloy. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications, 14644207231212566.

[7]. Raja, S., & Rajan, A. J. (2022). A Decision-Making Model for Selection of the Suitable FDM Machine Using Fuzzy TOPSIS. 2022.

[8]. Radu, E. R., & Simion, I. (2025). ADDITIVE TECHNOLOGIES PROCESSES: AN EXTENSIVE STUDY. Journal of Industrial Design and Engineering Graphics, 20(1), 15-22.

[9]. Raja, S., Agrawal, A. P., Patil, P. P., Thimothy, P., Capangpangan, R. Y., Singhal, P., & Wotango, M. T. (2022). Optimization of 3D Printing Process Parameters of Polylactic Acid Filament Based on the Mechanical Test. 2022.

[10]. Raja, S., Jayalakshmi, M., Rusho, M. A., Selvaraj, V. K., Subramanian, J., Yishak, S., & Kumar, T. A. (2024). Fused deposition modeling process parameter optimization on the development of graphene enhanced polyethylene terephthalate glycol. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 30744.

[11]. Raja, S., Murali, A. P., & Praveenkumar, V. (2024). Tailored microstructure control in Additive Manufacturing: Constant and varying energy density approach for nickel 625 superalloy. Materials Letters, 375, 137249.

[12]. Raja, S., Ali, R. M., Babar, Y. V., Surakasi, R., Karthikeyan, S., Panneerselvam, B., & Jagadheeswari, A. S. (2024). Integration of nanomaterials in FDM for enhanced surface properties: Optimized manufacturing approaches. Applied Chemical Engineering, 7(3).

[13]. Raja, S., Rajan, A. J., Kumar, V. P., Rajeswari, N., Girija, M., Modak, S., Kumar, R. V., & Mammo, W. D. (2022). Selection of Additive Manufacturing Machine Using Analytical Hierarchy Process. 2022.

[14]. Raja, S., Rao, R., Shekar, S., Dsilva Winfred Rufuss, D., Rajan, A. J., Rusho, M. A., & Navas, R. (2025). Application of multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) for site selection of offshore wind farms in India. Operational Research, 25(3), 1-34.

[15]. S. Raja, A. John Rajan, "Challenges and Opportunities in Additive Manufacturing Polymer Technology: A Review Based on Optimization Perspective", Advances in Polymer Technology, vol. 2023, Article ID 8639185, 18 pages, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8639185

[16]. S., R., & A., J. R. (2023). Selection of Polymer Extrusion Parameters By Factorial Experimental Design – A Decision Making Model. Scientia Iranica, (), -. doi: 10.24200/sci.2023.60096.6591

[17]. S., Aarthi, S., Raja, Rusho, Maher Ali, Yishak, Simon, Bridging Plant Biotechnology and Additive Manufacturing: A Multicriteria Decision Approach for Biopolymer Development, Advances in Polymer Technology, 2025, 9685300, 24 pages, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1155/adv/9685300

[18]. Selvaraj, V. K., Subramanian, J., Krishna Rajeev, P., Rajendran, V., & Raja, S. Optimization of conductive nanofillers in bio‐based polyurethane foams for ammonia‐sensing application. Polymer Engineering & Science.

[19]. Subramani Raja, Ahamed Jalaludeen Mohammad Iliyas, Paneer Selvam Vishnu, Amaladas John Rajan, Maher Ali Rusho, Mohamad Reda Refaa, Oluseye Adewale Adebimpe. Sustainable manufacturing of FDM-manufactured composite impellers using hybrid machine learning and simulation-based optimization. Materials ScienceinAdditive Manufacturing 2025, 4(3), 025200033. https://doi.org/10.36922/MSAM025200033

[20]. Subramani, R. (2025). Optimizing process parameters for enhanced mechanical performance in 3D printed impellers using graphene-reinforced polylactic acid (G-PLA) filament. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 1-11.

[21]. Subramani, R., & Yishak, S. (2024). Utilizing Additive Manufacturing for Fabricating Energy Storage Components From Graphene‐Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites. Advances in Polymer Technology, 2024(1), 6464049.

[22]. Subramani, R., Kaliappan, S., Arul, P. V, Sekar, S., Poures, M. V. De, Patil, P. P., & Esakki, E. S. (2022). A Recent Trend on Additive Manufacturing Sustainability with Supply Chain Management Concept , Multicriteria Decision Making Techniques. 2022.

[23]. Subramani, R., Kaliappan, S., Sekar, S., Patil, P. P., Usha, R., Manasa, N., & Esakkiraj, E. S. (2022). Polymer Filament Process Parameter Optimization with Mechanical Test and Morphology Analysis. 2022.

[24]. Saeed, M. A., Junejo, F., Amin, I., Tanoli, I. K., Ahmed, S., Alluhaidan, A. S. D., & Ateya, A. A. (2025). Optimizing Economic and Environmental Objectives in Sustainable Machining Processes. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 101067.

[25]. Subramani, R., Leon, R. R., Nageswaren, R., Rusho, M. A., & Shankar, K. V. (2025). Tribological Performance Enhancement in FDM and SLA Additive Manufacturing: Materials, Mechanisms, Surface Engineering, and Hybrid Strategies—A Holistic Review. Lubricants, 13(7), 298.

[26]. Subramani, R., Vijayakumar, P., Rusho, M. A., Kumar, A., Shankar, K. V., & Thirugnanasambandam, A. K. (2024). Selection and Optimization of Carbon-Reinforced Polyether Ether Ketone Process Parameters in 3D Printing—A Rotating Component Application. Polymers, 16(10), 1443.

[27]. Theng, A. A. S., Jayamani, E., Subramanian, J., Selvaraj, V. K., Viswanath, S., Sankar, R., ... & Rusho, M. A. (2025). A review on industrial optimization approach in polymer matrix composites manufacturing. International Polymer Processing.

[28]. Subramani, R., Kalidass, A. K., Muneeswaran, M. D., & Lakshmipathi, B. G. (2024). Effect of fused deposition modeling process parameter in influence of mechanical property of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene polymer. Applied Chemical Engineering, 7(1).

[29]. Skrzek, K., Mazgajczyk, E., & Dybała, B. (2025). Application of Fuzzy Logic-Based Expert Advisory Systems in Optimizing the Decision-Making Process for Material Selection in Additive Manufacturing. Materials, 18(2), 324.

[30]. He, C., & Jiang, J. (2025). Improving Quality Evaluation for Control Systems of Machining Line Product Processing With Smart Algorithmic Techniques in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multiple-Attribute Group Decision-Making. IEEE Access.

[31]. Zenani, S., Obileke, K., Ndiweni, O., & Mukumba, P. (2025). A Review of the Application of Fuzzy Logic in Bioenergy Technology. Processes, 13(7), 2251.

[32]. Behera, A. P., Sabar, C., Kumar, A., Ranjan, A., Ranjan, R. K., Bhushan, M., ... & Dash, B. (2025). Uncertainty-aware optimization of construction time–cost-quality trade-offs via Fuzzy-MOPSO. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 1-17.

[33]. Raja, S., Praveenkumar, V., Rusho, M. A., & Yishak, S. (2024). Optimizing additive manufacturing parameters for graphene-reinforced PETG impeller production: A fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS approach. Results in Engineering, 24, 103018.

[34]. Bigliardi, B., Dolci, V., Filippelli, S., Petroni, A., & Pini, B. (2025). Employing innovation for social sustainability in supply chains: a systematic literature review. Procedia Computer Science, 253, 2595-2604.

[35]. Ab Rahman, M. H., Mahmud, J., Jumaidin, R., & Rahman, S. M. A. Integrated CRITIC-TOPSIS and Monte Carlo Sensitivity Analysis for Optimal Various Natural Fibre Selection in Sustainable Building Insulation Composites to Support the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering, 5(2), 231-260.

[36]. Xu, K. (2025). Decision-support frameworks for MCDA method selection and emission abatement technology assessment in the maritime sector (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southampton).

[37]. Mutambik, I. (2025). Assessing Critical Success Factors for Supply Chain 4.0 Implementation Using a Hybrid MCDM Framework. Systems, 13(6), 489.

[38]. Wang, C. N., Nguyen, T. D., Nguyen, T. T. T., & Do, N. H. (2025). The performance analysis using Six Sigma DMAIC and integrated MCDM approach: A case study for microlens process in Vietnam. Journal of Engineering Research, 13(2), 538-550.

[39]. Basar, G., & Der, O. (2025). Multi-objective optimization of process parameters for laser cutting polyethylene using fuzzy AHP-based MCDM methods. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering, 09544089251319202.