Applied Chemical Engineering

Enhancing performance of planar structure single unit 800 °C O2-SOFC at atmospheric pressure: A numerical modeling approach for electric power production

Ismail Benchebiba

LGEER Laboratory, Faculty of Technology, Hassiba Benbouali University of Chlef, 02000, Algeria

Mohamed Mostefaoui

LGEER Laboratory, Faculty of Technology, Hassiba Benbouali University of Chlef, 02000, Algeria

Ahmed Nour El Islam Ayad

Electrical Engineering Department, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Kasdi Merbah University of Ouargla, 30000, Algeria ； APELEC Laboratory, Djilali Liabes University, Sidi Bel Abbes, 22000, Algeria

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/ace.v9i1.5812

Keywords: solid oxide fuel cell; electrochemical; cathode; anode; electrical power

---

Abstract

Solid oxide fuel cells generate electricity with high electrical efficiency and flexibility in fuel use without emitting pollutants, such as carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxides, sulfur oxides and particulates. Nevertheless, they still face several obstacles and challenges that pose problems and questions driving researchers to find solutions. Numerical simulation is a key tool for integrating various physical fields, including charge dynamics, electrochemical pathways, chemical species kinetics, fluid flow, and energy transformations. The Butler-Volmer equation, in its various forms and approximations, is the most widely used equation for relating electrochemical pathways to current density in solid oxide fuel cell modeling. The main objective of this research is to model and simulate a high-temperature solid oxide fuel cell at atmospheric pressure, in order to test the effect of changing some properties values on the electrical power density produced. The results obtained revealed several techniques for enhancing the fuel cell performance, by improving the physical behaviors appropriate to each property on the corresponding side. It was found that fuel cell performance improves with increasing values of porosity rate, exchange current density, and pressure drop, and with decreasing both cell length and electrolyte thickness. Furthermore, since the electrolyte's conductivity class is oxygen ion carrier, the effect of parameters at the cathode side was more significant compared to the anode side. The results of this research are consistent with well-documented theories, and it is usable for developing other numerical models.

---

References

[1]. Wilk-Jakubowski J L, Pawlik L, Wilk-Jakubowski G, et al. State-of-the-Art in the Use of Renewable Energy Sources on the Example of Wind, Wave Energy, Tidal Energy, and Energy Harvesting: A Review from 2015 to 2024. Energies. 2025. 18: 1356. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18061356

[2]. Sazali N, Wan Salleh WN, Jamaludin AS, et al. New Perspectives on Fuel Cell Technology: A Brief Review. Membranes. 2020. 10: 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes10050099

[3]. Jawad NH, Yahya AA, Al-Shathr AR, et al. Fuel Cell Types, Properties of Membrane, and Operating Conditions: A Review. Sustainability. 2022: 14; 14653. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114653

[4]. Lo Vecchio C, Sebastián D, Lázaro MJ, et al. Methanol-Tolerant M–N–C Catalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reactions in Acidic Media and Their Application in Direct Methanol Fuel Cells. Catalysts 2018: 8: 650. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8120650

[5]. Fakhreddine O, Gharbia Y, Derakhshandeh JF, et al. Challenges and Solutions of Hydrogen Fuel Cells in Transportation Systems: A Review and Prospects. World Electric Vehicle Journal. 2023, 14, 156. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj14060156

[6]. Elkafas A G, Rivarolo M, Gadducci E, et al. Fuel Cell Systems for Maritime: A Review of Research Development, Commercial Products, Applications, and Perspectives. Processes. 2023: 11: 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11010097

[7]. Helal H, Ahrouch M, Rabehi A, et al. Nanostructured Materials for Enhanced Performance of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells: A Comprehensive Review. Crystals; 2024, 14, 306. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst14040306

[8]. Pianko-Oprych P, Zinko T, Jaworski Z. A Numerical Investigation of the Thermal Stresses of a Planar Solid Oxide Fuel Cell. Materials. 2016, 9, 814. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9100814

[9]. Hodjati-Pugh O, Dhir A, Steinberger-Wilckens R. The Development of Current Collection in Micro-Tubular Solid Oxide Fuel Cells—A Review. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 1077. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11031077

[10]. Mendonça C, Ferreira A, Santos DMF. Towards the Commercialization of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells: Recent Advances in Materials and Integration Strategies. Fuels: 2021, 2, 393-419. https://doi.org/10.3390/fuels2040023

[11]. Yahyazadeh A. A Comprehensive Review of the Development of Perovskite Oxide Anodes for Fossil Fuel-Based Solid Oxide Fuel Cells(SOFCs):Prospects and Challenges. Physchem. 2025, 5, 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/physchem5030025

[12]. Sun R, Li S, Gao L, et al. Ni-Doped Pr0.5Ba0.5CoO3+δ Perovskite with Low Polarization Resistance and Thermal Expansivity as a Cathode Material for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. Molecules. 2025, 30, 1482. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30071482

[13]. Patel VK, Gholamalian F, Kalyvas C, et al. Modelling Mass Transport in Anode-Supported Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. Electronics 2025; 14; 3486. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14173486

[14]. Kuterbekov KA, Nikonov AV, Bekmyrza KZ, et al. Classification of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1059. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12071059

[15]. Kong W, Gao X, Liu S, et al. Optimization of the Interconnect Ribs for a Cathode-Supported Solid Oxide Fuel Cell. Energies 2014, 7, 295-313. https://doi.org/10.3390/en7010295

[16]. Park JM, Kim DY, Baek JD, et al. Effect of Electrolyte Thickness on Electrochemical Reactions and Thermo-Fluidic Characteristics inside a SOFC Unit Cell. Energies 2018, 11, 473. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1103047

[17]. Nguyen XV, Three-Dimensional Simulation of the Operating Characteristics of Cell Layers in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 4462. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15084462

[18]. https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/Research/Groups/Advanced-Materials-Research-Group/Images/Energy-Materials/SOFC-466.jpg

[19]. Current Density Distribution in Solid Oxide Fuel Cell. COMSOL Multiphysics Tutorial Guide. Available online: https://cn.comsol.com/model/current-density-distribution-in-a-solid-oxide-fuel-cell-514

[20]. Borgnakke C, Sonntag RE. (1997). Thermodynamic and transport properties. (No Title).

[21]. Todd B, Young JB. Thermodynamic and transport properties of gases for use in solid oxide fuel cell modelling.2002. Journal of power Sources, 2002. 110(1), 186-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00277-X

[22]. Ranasinghe SN, Middleton PH. Modelling of single cell solid oxide fuel cells using COMSOL multiphysics. In: the proceeding of 2017 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2017 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe. 06-09 June 2017 .Milan, Italy.

[23]. Hussain, MM, Baschuk JJ, Li X, et al. Thermodynamic analysis of a PEM fuel cell power system. 2005 International journal of thermal sciences; 44(9), 903-911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2005.02.009

[24]. Khazaee I, Rava A. Numerical simulation of the performance of solid oxide fuel cell with different flow channel geometries. 2017; Energy, 119, 235-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.12.074

[25]. Ouba AKDO, Chinelatto AL, Borcezi JS, et al. Influence of the Number of Dimensions in the Impedance Spectroscopy Simulation of a YSZ Electrolyte. Materials Research. 2022; 25, 20220259. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5373-MR-2022-0259

[26]. Iliev IK, Gizzatullin AR, Filimonova AA, et al. Numerical Simulation of Processes in an Electrochemical Cell Using COMSOL Multiphysics. Energies. 2023; 16: 7265. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16217265

[27]. Singhal SC, Kendal K. High temperature and solid oxide fuel cells: fundamentals, design and applications. 1st ed. USA: Elsevier Science; 2003

[28]. Zhang X, Wang L, Espinoza M, et al. Numerical simulation of solid oxide fuel cells comparing different electrochemical kinetics. International Journal of Energy Research, 2021; 45(9), 12980-12995. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.6628

[29]. Murad A, Kumar L, Harijan K, et al. Thermal Modeling and Performance Investigation of Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) Fuel Cell. VFAST Transactions on Mathematics. 2023; 11(2):112-125. https://doi.org/10.21015/vtm.v11i2.1640

[30]. Liu Y, Liu J, Fu L, et al. Numerical Study on Effects of Flow Channel Length on Solid Oxide Fuel Cell-Integrated System Performances. Sustainability. 2024; 16(4):1643. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041643

[31]. Ternero F, Rosa LG, Urban P, et al. Influence of the Total Porosity on the Properties of Sintered Materials—A Review. Metals. 2021; 11(5):730. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11050730

[32]. Barbir F. Fuel Cell Electrochemistry. In: PEM Fuel Cells (Second Edition), 2nd ed. Elsevier; 2013. 33-72.

[33]. Rasheed RKA, Liao Q, Caizhi Z, et al. A review on modelling of high temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells (HT-PEMFCs). International journal of hydrogen energy, 2017; 42(5): 3142-3165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.10.078

[34]. Bandal H, Koteshwara Reddy KK, et al. Iron-based heterogeneous catalysts for oxygen evolution reaction; change in perspective from activity promoter to active catalyst. Journal of Power Sources. 2018; 395(Issue):106-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.05.047

[35]. Paz C, Suárez E, Cabarcos A, et al. Experimental Investigation and CFD Analysis of Pressure Drop in an ORC Boiler for a WHRS Implementation. Sensors. 2022; 22(23):9437. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22239437