Applied Chemical Engineering

Comparative Analysis of Blowing Agents for Coal Gasification in Oxy-Fuel Energy Complexes

Andrey Rogalev

Department of Innovative Technologies of High-Tech Industries, Moscow Power Engineering Institute, National Research University, 14 Krasnokazarmennaya Str., Moscow 111250, Russia

Sergey Osipov

Department of Innovative Technologies of High-Tech Industries, Moscow Power Engineering Institute, National Research University, 14 Krasnokazarmennaya Str., Moscow 111250, Russia

Muhammad Maaz Shaikh

Department of Innovative Technologies of High-Tech Industries, Moscow Power Engineering Institute, National Research University, 14 Krasnokazarmennaya Str., Moscow 111250, Russia

Andrey Vegera

Department of Innovative Technologies of High-Tech Industries, Moscow Power Engineering Institute, National Research University, 14 Krasnokazarmennaya Str., Moscow 111250, Russia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/ace.v8i4.5828

Keywords: Oxy-fuel combustion; Coal gasification; Blasting agents; Allam cycle; Thermal efficiency; CO₂ capture; Syngas composition; Heat recovery

---

Abstract

Oxy-fuel energy complexes (OFCs) offer a promising approach for carbon dioxide (CO₂) capture in coal-fired power plants, but efficient coal gasification is crucial to maintain high cycle efficiency. However, there are currently no studies on the effect of the type of blowing agent on OFCs’ efficiency. This study evaluates various blowing agents—air, oxygen, steam, CO₂, and their mixtures—for gasification of Kaakhemsky coal, focusing on optimal consumption, generator gas composition, temperature, calorific value, and efficiency. Using heat balance equations and equilibrium constants, calculations were performed under assumptions of stationary operation at 40 atm pressure, incorporating reactions like water-gas shift and methane reforming. Results indicate that air-based blasting yields high nitrogen content (up to 54%), leading to low calorific values (8.4 MJ/m³) and high NOx emissions, rendering it unsuitable. Pure CO₂ and steam blasting require excessive agent consumption (6.2–10 kg/kg coal) and external heat, producing low-quality gas with high CO₂ or H₂O fractions inhibiting combustion. Oxygen blasting provides high-quality gas (2% non-combustibles, 17.8 MJ/m³ calorific value) but demands pure oxygen and excess heat recovery at 1004°C. Mixtures of oxygen with steam or CO₂ emerge as optimal: oxygen-steam reduces oxygen consumption to 0.3 kg/kg coal, enhancing calorific value to 19.7 MJ/m³ at 187°C, while oxygen-CO₂ achieves 17.2 MJ/m³ at 260°C without steam generation needed. Both options minimize non-combustible species fraction (<7%), support stable combustion, and align with OFCs’ requirements for low emissions and high efficiency. Recommendations include cycle modeling to compare these for integrated power plant design, potentially improving CO₂ capture and thermal performance.

---

References

[1]. Letcher T.M.: Why do we have global warming? In: Managing Global Warming. An Interface of Technology and Human Issues. Academic Press, 2019, 3–15.

[2]. Rogalev A., Komarov I., Kindra V., Zlyvko O.: Entrepreneurial assessment of sustainable development technologies for power energy sector. Entrep. Sustain. Iss. 6(2018), 1, 429–445.

[3]. Bose B.K.: Global warming: Energy, environmental pollution, and the impact of power electronics. IEE Ind. Electron. M. 4(2010), 1, 6–17.

[4]. Huang W., Chen W., Anandarajah G.: The role of technology diffusion in a decarbonizing world to limit global warming to well below 2C: An assessment with application of Global TIMES model. Appl. Energ. 208(2017), 291–301.

[5]. Ziółkowski P., Zakrzewski W., Badur J., Kaczmarczyk O.: Thermodynamic analysis of the double Brayton cycle with the use of oxy combustion and capture of CO2. Arch. Thermodyn. 34(2013), 2, 23–38.

[6]. Barba F.C., Sanchez G.M.D., Segui B.S., Darabkhani H.G., Anthony E.J.: A technical evaluation, performance analysis and risk assessment of multiple novel oxy-turbine power cycles with complete CO2 capture. J. Clean. Prod. 133(2016), 971–985.

[7]. Kotowicz J., Job M.: Thermodynamic analysis of the advanced zero emission power plant. Arch. Thermodyn. 37(2016), 1, 87–98.

[8]. Allam R.J., Palmer M.R., Brown G.W.J., Fetvedt J., Freed D., Nomoto H., Itoh M., Okita N., Jones C.J.: High efficiency and low cost of electricity generation from fossil fuels while elimi-nating atmospheric emissions, including carbon dioxide. Enrgy Proced. 37(2013), 1135–1149. [9] Khallaghi N., Hanak D. P., Manovic V.: Techno-economic evaluation of nearzero CO2 emission gas-fired power generation technologies: A review. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 74(2020), 103095.

[9]. Scaccabarozzi R., Gatti M., Martelli E.: Thermodynamic analysis and numerical optimization of the NET Power oxy-combustion cycle. Appl. Energ. 178(2016), 505–526.

[10]. Rogalev A., Kindra V., Osipov S., Rogalev N.: Thermodynamic analysis of the net power oxy-combustion cycle. In: Proc. 13th Eur. Conf. on Turbomachinery Fluid Dynamics and Thermodynamics, ETC13, Lausanne April 8-12, 2018, ETC2019-030.

[11]. Martins F., Felgueiras C., Smitkova M., Caetano N.: Analysis of fossil fuel energy consumption and environmental impacts in European countries. Energies 12(2019), 6, 964.

[12]. Warner K.J., Jones G.A.: The 21st century coal question: China, India, development, and climate change. Atmosphere 10(2019), 8, 476.

[13]. Weiland N. T., White C. W. Techno-economic analysis of an integrated gasification direct-fired supercritical CO2 power cycle // Fuel. – 2018. – V. 212. – P. 613–625.

[14]. Zhao Y. et al. Parametric study of a direct-fired supercritical carbon dioxide power cycle coupled to coal gasification process // Energy Conversion and Management. – 2018. – V. 156. – P. 733–745.

[15]. Zhao Y. et al. Thermodynamic analysis of a novel dual expansion coal-fueled direct-fired supercritical carbon dioxide power cycle // Applied Energy. – 2018. – V. 217. – P. 480–495.

[16]. Komarov I. et al. Thermodynamic Analysis of the Low-Grade Heat Sources for the Improvement in Efficiency of Oxy–Fuel Combustion Power Cycles // Inventions. – Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. – 2023. – V. 8. – Issue 1.

[17]. Xin T. et al. A new process splitting analytical method for the coal-based Allam cycle: Thermodynamic assessment and process integration // Energy. – 2023. – V. 267.

[18]. Lu X. et al. Integration and Optimization of Coal Gasification Systems With a Near-Zero Emissions Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Power Cycle // American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection. – 2016.

[19]. Zhu Z. et al. Performance study on s-CO2 power cycle with oxygen fired fuel of s-water gasification of coal // Energy Conversion and Management. – 2019. – V. 199.

[20]. Popov S.K., Ippolitov V.A. Solving high-temperature heat technology problems in the Mathcad environment: a tutorial. – Moscow: MPEI Publishing House, 2009. – 95 p.

[21]. Mitor V. V., Dubrovsky I. E., Karasina E. S. Thermal calculation of boiler units (Normative method) under the general editorship of N. V. Kuznetsov. - 3rd ed., revised - 1998.