Applied Chemical Engineering

Determining the Dispersion Characteristics of a modified Venturi Using CFD and Validating them in a Flotation Column within a Water-Air-Mineral system

José Guadalupe González V

Instituto de Investigación en Metalurgia y Materiales.Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo. Santiago Tapia 403. C.P.58000. Morelia, Michoacán, México

Ramiro Escudero García

Instituto de Investigación en Metalurgia y Materiales.Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo. Santiago Tapia 403. C.P.58000. Morelia, Michoacán, México

Hugo Arcos Gutiérrez

CONAHCYT-CIATEQ, eje 126, No. 225, zona industrial, C.P. 78395, San Luis Potosí, S. L. P., México

Martín Reyes P

Área Académica de Ciencias de la Tierra y Materiales. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo. Mineral de la Reforma 42186. Pachuca, Hidalgo, México

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/ace.v9i3.5997

Keywords: CFD simulation, gas dispersions, column flotation, Venturi-type gas disperser, reverse flotation

---

Abstract

The design, evaluation, and metallurgical validation of a modified Venturi-type gas disperser for controlling the dispersion characteristics (bubble diameter, retained gas volume, and bubble surface area) in a laboratory flotation column are presented. The design was carried out using CFD simulations in a transient regime, evaluating different geometric and air-supply configurations. The optimal configuration corresponds to a 3:1 diameter ratio and four air inlets at 45°, which generated stable pressure drops and homogeneous dispersion.
The simulated disperser was fabricated from polyamide and experimentally characterized in a water-air system under 35 operating conditions. Bubble diameters (Db) ranged from 0.63 to 2.31 mm, with retained gas fractions (εg) from 13 to 19% and bubble surface area flux (Sb) between 65 and 81 s⁻¹; these ranges are within the values typically recommended to improve particle capture and transport in column flotation.
The characteristics of the simulated and experimental dispersions show similarities with differences of less than 20%.
Subsequently, the disperser was evaluated in a three-phase system (water-air-mineral) for the concentration of a mineral containing 54 ppm of gold by reverse column flotation. The appropriate operating variables were established: superficial liquid velocity (Jl) of 0.0127 m/s, and superficial gas velocity (Jg) of 0.0085 m/s, achieving concentrations of up to 76 ppm Au in the tailings stream.
Experimental results demonstrate that controlling Db, εg, and Sb through CFD design and experimental validation directly affects the metallurgical performance of the process, establishing a comprehensive methodology for designing dispersers for mineral applications.

---

References

[1]. A. Gupta, D.S. Yan, Chapter 16 - Flotation, Editor(s): A. Gupta, D.S. Yan, Mineral Processing Design and Operation, Elsevier Science, 2006, Pages 555–603, ISBN 9780444516367. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044451636-7/50017-6

[2]. Dobby & Finch, 1990. Column Flotation, Pergamon Press.

[3]. Jameson, G. J., Nam, S., Moo-Young, M. (1977a). Physical factors affecting recovery rates in flotation. Min. Sci. Eng., 9(3), 103–118.

[4]. Yusheng Wang, Lisha Dong, Xiangning Bu, Chao Ni, Guangyuan Xie. Study on inhibition mechanisms of detachment of coal particles from oily bubbles in flotation column, Powder Technology, Volume 434, 2024, 119368, ISSN 0032-5910, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2024.119368

[5]. Xiangning Bu, Shaoqi Zhou, Meng Sun, Muidh Alheshibri, Md. Shakhaoath Khan, Guangyuan Xie, and Saeed Chehreh Chelgani. Exploring the Relationships between Gas Dispersion Parameters and Differential Pressure Fluctuations in a Column Flotation. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 21900−21908. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c01955

[6]. López-Saucedo, F., Uribe-Salas, A., Pérez-Garibay, R., & Magallanes-Hernández, L. (2012). Gas dispersion in column flotation and its effect on recovery and grade. Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly, 51(2), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1179/1879139511Y.0000000033

[7]. B. K. Gorain, J. P. Franzidis, E. V. Manlapig (2000). Flotation Cell Design: Application of Fundamental Principles, Julius Kruttschnitt Mineral Research Centre, Indooroopilly, Queensland, Australia, Academic Press.

[8]. Gembe Huaroco, J. E., Escudero García, R., & Arcos Gutiérrez, H. (2018). CFD simulation of a sparger type venturi to generate bubbles in a two-phase flotation system. 43(2), 263.

[9]. Huang, J., Sun, L. C., Du, M., Liang, Z., Mo, Z. Y., Tang, J. G., Xie, G. (2019). An investigation on the performance of a micro-scale Venturi bubble generator. Chemical Engineering Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.02.068

[10]. Li Guiyi. (1992). Turbulence modelling. Proceedings - ICE: Water, Maritime & Energy, 96(3), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1201/b19471-8

[11]. Xiangning Bu, Tuantuan Zhang, Yuran Chen, Guangyuan Xie & Yaoli Peng (2017): Comparative study of conventional cell and cyclonic microbubble flotation column for upgrading a difficult-to-float Chinese coking coal using statistical evaluation, International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization, DOI: 10.1080/19392699.2017.1359577

[12]. M. Wang, C. Ni, X. Bu, Y. Peng, G. Xie, Z. Tan, H. Yu, CFD-PBM simulation of the column flotation unit of FCMC: Importance of gas–liquid interphase forces models. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2023, 101(10), 5925. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.24828

[13]. Barigou, M., Greaves, M. (1991). A capillary suction probe for bubble size measurement. Meas. Sci. Technol., 2, 318–326.

[14]. Grau, R. A., Heiskanen, K. (2002). Visual technique for measuring bubble size in flotation machines. Minerals Engineering, 15(7), 507–513.

[15]. Escudero, R. (2007). Modelos matemáticos comúnmente empleados en sistemas de dispersión para estimar las características de las mismas, Programa de capacitación y adiestramiento SPUM, UMSNH.

[16]. Tavera, F. J., & Escudero García, R. (2013). Effect of Solids on Gas Holdup Characteristics in Flotation Column: Addition of Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Solids. 56(2), 1–13.

[17]. Sarhan, A. R., Naser, J., & Brooks, G. (2016). CFD simulation on influence of suspended solid particles on bubbles’ coalescence rate in flotation cell. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 146, 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.minpro.2015.11.014

[18]. Sarhan, A. R., Naser, J., & Brooks, G. (2017). CFD analysis of solid particles properties effect in three-phase flotation column. Separation and Purification Technology, 185, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2017.04.042

[19]. J.B. Yianatos, J.A. Finch, Gas holdup versus gas rate in the bubbly regime. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 29(1–2), 141–146 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-7516(90)90011-M

[20]. Finch, J.A., Dobby, G.S. (1991). Column flotation: A selected review. Part I. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 33(1–4), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-7516(91)90062-N

[21]. Appendix 2 - List of ASTM International and AASHTO Test Methods Related to Asphalt Testing (Listed by Subject), Editor(s): James G. Speight, Asphalt Materials Science and Technology, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2016, Pages 531–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800273-5.00021-0

[22]. Reza M. Rahman, Seher Ata, Graeme J. Jameson (2012). The effect of flotation variables on the recovery of different particle size fractions in the froth and the pulp. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 106–109, 70–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.minpro.2012.03.001